DroneLedger

Airport disruption

Stavanger and Haugesund airspace briefly closed after suspected drone report

Stavanger · 16 Oct 2022 · event date · approximate location

Airspace serving Stavanger Sola and Haugesund airports was briefly closed on 16 October 2022 after a reported suspected drone. Both closures arose from the same report; they are kept in one dossier. [1][2]

Drone presence is reported. The consequences are established. The operator is not established.

Drone presenceReported[1][2]
ImpactConfirmed[1][2]
AttributionNot established

DroneLedger editorial team, publisher and editor responsible for this project.

AI-assisted editorial source review. This label records the editorial workflow, not a personal check of every source or sentence. Method and corrections

2 source families · a count of sources is not a verification score

AI-assisted editorial source review · 21 Oct 2026 · Dossier updated 21 Oct 2026

You are viewing revision 3 as published on 21 Oct 2026. The dossier text, evidence states, claims and sources of this revision are fixed; catalogue context such as cost estimates is not shown here. View the current version

What do we know now?

Airspace serving Stavanger Sola and Haugesund airports was briefly closed on 16 October 2022 after a reported suspected drone. Both closures arose from the same report; they are kept in one dossier.

Facts at a glance
Drone type
  • No named drone type is recorded in this dossier.
Effects
  • According to SVT, citing NRK, the report describes a suspension of operations
  • According to dagsavisen.no, citing Avinor, Avinor announced reopening of both airports
Who reported what
  • dagsavisen.no: Assessment of drone involvement; reported outcome
  • SVT: Assessment of drone involvement; effects
Source families
  • 2 source families are recorded; republication is not independent confirmation

Further details are not known from the cited sources.

Timeline

Three clocks, one reading line

Shared calendar-day axis, from left to right. Bars mark days or reporting windows, not durations. Publication and revision clocks are not event clocks. Missing clocks remain unknown; the table gives all available precision and source links. The plot follows recorded calendar dates; time zones may differ. It establishes neither within-day order nor causality.

Three clocks, one reading line
TrackRecorded date / time
1 · Event
  • · Calendar day; time unknown
2 · Source publication
3 · Dossier revisions

What remains uncertain?

  • Was a drone established? A published investigation or identification could resolve this.
  • Who operated it, and why? An attributed investigation finding is missing.
Check the evidence
Source passage
  • Avinor · “Stavanger og Haugesund har nå åpnet igjen” dagsavisen.no
  • Norwegian police via NRK · “Vi har inte lyckats observera den själva” SVT
  • NRK via SVT · “Vid 21:45 ska luftrummet ha öppnats igen.” SVT

Operational effects

  • The cited source reports an airport disruption window.

    Disruption window · Reopened: Source [2]

    Vid 21:45 ska luftrummet ha öppnats igen.

    NRK via SVT · Source [2]

    As of: Time not established

    Europe/Oslo CEST+02. Source-reported reopening, no inferred start/duration. Dagsavisen21:40is time of reopening announcement, not necessarily its operational endpoint.

Claims and evidence

2 sources · 2 original statements

Sources that repeat the same original statement count once: a number of articles is not a number of independent confirmations.

ClaimOriginal sourceAssessment
Impact

Avinor announced reopening of both airports.

[1]
Source passage
“Stavanger og Haugesund har nå åpnet igjen”

Passage checked word for word against the source on 16 Oct 2026.

Avinor via Dagsavisen / NTBSupports the report

Short literal passage read on the public source page; reported drone presence is not technical identification.

Drone

Police had not observed the object themselves.

[2]
Source passage
“Vi har inte lyckats observera den själva”

Passage checked word for word against the source on 16 Oct 2026.

Norwegian police via NRK via SVTContext only

Short literal passage read on the public source page; reported drone presence is not technical identification.

Source genealogy

Grouped by recorded original statement, not by publisher. Unmapped sources have unknown dependency; linked statements may also share an earlier origin. This is not an independence score.

  1. Avinor
    • Dagsavisen / NTB: Avinor reopening and police account [1] · Relayed statement
  2. Norwegian police via NRK
    • SVT: separate NRK police interview relay [2] · Relayed statement
Show source graph

Left: publishers; right: recorded original statement. Converging lines show shared origin, not publication order. Dashed nodes have unknown dependency.

Read with a source omitted

Reading aid: switch off a source or family to inspect the remaining visible support below. Evidence status is not recalculated.

How to read this table

Reading aid only. Switch off a source or its recorded family to inspect the remaining visible support for exact claim texts. Evidence status is not recalculated. Shared wording or a shared family does not prove independence. Only recorded links labelled “supports” count here; context and contradiction links are not support. The dossier itself is unchanged.

Claim → supporting sources · recorded links
ClaimSupporting sourcesVisible support
Avinor announced reopening of both airports.[1]Support remains visible
Police had not observed the object themselves.No supporting link recordedNo supporting link recorded

What we know

NTB reports airspace reopening at 21:40 local time after nearly an hour. SVT gives approximately 21:45. These are approximate accounts of one precautionary interruption, not an exact independently timed shutdown or a physical collision.

NTB relays the airport operator’s reopening statement and police account. SVT separately relays a police interview with NRK. Both share underlying aviation reports and some Avinor material via VG; no independently identified device established. VG itself was not fetched or used as a selected source.

Data
No structured detail recorded
Hit / damaged · Fell near · Intercepted (claimed) · Human consequences

What remains unknown

Police had not observed the object themselves. No recovered device, type or operator established. Different reporting and reopening times are not multiple flights. Haugesund was affected by the same precaution; no second sighting there inferred. Other Norwegian drone cases and unrelated arrests do not establish attribution here. No reported flight position or altitude reproduced.

No operator or responsible organisation established by the reviewed sources.

How the story changed

  1. Airspace serving Stavanger Sola and Haugesund airports was briefly closed on 16 October 2022 after a reported suspected drone. Both closures arose from the same report; they are kept in one dossier. [1]

Original sources (2)

2 source families · a count of sources is not a verification score

1Dagsavisen / NTB: Avinor reopening and police account16 Oct 2022 · source family: Ntb2SVT: separate NRK police interview relay16 Oct 2022 · source family: SVT

Editorial changes

  1. Revision 3 · 21 Oct 2026Typography: added missing spaces in dates and times (live-site audit 21 Oct 2026); no change of content.
  2. Revision 2 · 16 Oct 2026Added source-stated disruption windows (UTC) and the original key term used by the source.
  3. Revision 1 · 16 Oct 2026Curated dossier created after checking the cited sources line by line.

Cite this dossier

Permanent page · Revision 3

Chicago

DroneLedger editorial team. “Stavanger and Haugesund airspace briefly closed after suspected drone report.” Dossier stavanger-haugesund-drone-report-2022-10-16, revision 3, updated 21 Oct 2026. https://droneincidents.com/incident/stavanger-haugesund-drone-report-2022-10-16/v3/

APA

DroneLedger editorial team. (21 Oct 2026). Stavanger and Haugesund airspace briefly closed after suspected drone report (Dossier stavanger-haugesund-drone-report-2022-10-16, revision 3). https://droneincidents.com/incident/stavanger-haugesund-drone-report-2022-10-16/v3/

Cite the revision you used: later revisions may change evidence states.

Cite this version

Maker
DroneLedger editorial team
ID
stavanger-haugesund-drone-report-2022-10-16
Revision or edition
3
Release
20261109T002636372024-fb099f
Publication date
21 Oct 2026
Accessed
09 Nov 2026
Permanent URL
https://droneincidents.com/incident/stavanger-haugesund-drone-report-2022-10-16/v3/
Hashed file
JSON · SHA-256 8495916a2a8090412065382c6c99fcbbd9e5e4db9d215e48991a0accbb7bf158

Dataset DOI for this exact version: Not yet in a DOI snapshot · DOI binding manifest

Dataset DOI (series, not this revision): 10.5281/zenodo.23345422

DroneLedger editorial team. Stavanger and Haugesund airspace briefly closed after suspected drone report. ID stavanger-haugesund-drone-report-2022-10-16; revision or edition 3; release 20261109T002636372024-fb099f; published 21 Oct 2026. https://droneincidents.com/incident/stavanger-haugesund-drone-report-2022-10-16/v3/ Accessed 09 Nov 2026. SHA-256 8495916a2a8090412065382c6c99fcbbd9e5e4db9d215e48991a0accbb7bf158 (https://droneincidents.com/data/citations/incident/stavanger-haugesund-drone-report-2022-10-16/r3/8495916a2a8090412065382c6c99fcbbd9e5e4db9d215e48991a0accbb7bf158/data.json). Not yet in a DOI snapshot.

Citation uses the English reference edition. Access date is the UTC date when this page was built; change it to your consultation date when reusing the citation.

Editorial pack (print / PDF)Follow this dossier (feed)Earlier versions