DroneLedgerPILOT

Editorial pack · DroneLedger

Pilot reports suspected drone during arrival at JFK

Dossier jfk-airport-pilot-drone-report-2015-07-31 · revision 1 · exported 2026-10-16 02:26 UTC · fixed version of this revision · JSON

Current state

A pilot reported an object thought to be a drone during an arrival at John F. Kennedy International Airport on 31 July 2015. The airline said the flight landed without incident; the FAA was investigating.

Evidence states

Drone presencereported · sources [1], [2]
Impactunknown · sources none
Attributionnone · sources none

The reviewed account describes a normal landing without evasive action. It does not establish a collision, physical damage, injury or an airport closure. No operational impact total asserted.

ABC7 obtained a Delta spokesperson’s response and relayed the pilot report. Separate FAA account. These are different operational and regulatory statements about one reported encounter, not two independent technical identifications.

Claims

2 sources · 2 original statements. Sources that repeat the same statement count once.

Claim and source passageOriginal sourceAssessment
Delta said it was cooperating with the investigation of the crew report.
“We are investigating and cooperating fully with the Federal Aviation Administration” [1]
Delta Air Lines (relayed)supports: Short literal passage read on the public source page; reported drone presence is not technical identification.
Normal landing reported.
“landed safely” [2]
FAA (relayed)context: Short literal passage read on the public source page; reported drone presence is not technical identification.

Earlier matching archive records

Published archive records only, not all real-world incidents or a common cause.

30 days: 0

90 days: 0

As of: 2026-10-16T02:26:41+00:00

Not established

The source publication is Saturday 1 August; it explicitly describes the preceding Friday event. The coarse New York City marker and airport association do not locate a drone at the terminal or runway. Device model, identity and operator were not established, and the pilot said the type could not be determined. Later separate sightings are not merged or added to a device total. No flight positions, route or proximity estimate included.

No operator or responsible organisation established by the reviewed sources.

Chronology

Sources

  1. ABC7 New York: Delta statement and pilot report (2015-08-01, source family: abc-news)
    https://abc7ny.com/post/faa-investigating-after-delta-pilot-reports-close-call-with-drone-before-landing-at-jfk-/896231/
  2. CBS: FAA account (2015-08-01, source family: cbs-news)
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/faa-to-investigate-drone-sighting-near-landing-plane-jfk-airport/

How to cite

DroneLedger. “Pilot reports suspected drone during arrival at JFK.” Dossier jfk-airport-pilot-drone-report-2015-07-31, revision 1, updated 16 Oct 2026. https://droneincidents.com/incident/jfk-airport-pilot-drone-report-2015-07-31/v1/

Editorial changes

Evidence states: confirmed = established by the cited evidence; reported = stated by a source, not independently established; inconclusive; debunked; unknown. A claim by a party to a conflict remains a claim. Methodology: https://droneincidents.com/methodology/